Nikita Bilozertsev vs Marcello Serafini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Serafini's recent form shows a 44.41% win rate on second serve points, compared to Bilozertsev's 40.1%. Does this provide Serafini with an edge? In many match-ups, yes, it could be significant in prediction accuracy.
• Return Game Stats: Serafini has dominated in recent second-serve return points with 50.18%, while Bilozertsev stands at 43.59%. Who's ahead on first serve returns? Bilozertsev leads with 33.44% over Serafini's 26.97%.
• Pressure Situations: Serafini excels under pressure, saving 58.23% of breakpoints compared to Bilozertsev's 50.62%. Can this tip the scales in Serafini's favor?
• Overall Match Wins: While Serafini has a 44.19% win rate over the last year, Bilozertsev boasts 63.16%, showing overall better performance.
• Preferred Surface: Serafini's best performance is on Hard courts with a 63% win rate, but struggles on Indoor Hard with 35%. Conversely, Bilozertsev thrives on Clay courts at 65% but lacks results on Hard courts at just 33%.
• Competitive Level: Within the Futures/ITF $10K events, Serafini has a win rate of 38.71%, whereas Bilozertsev has achieved 63.16%, indicating better recent tournament showings by Bilozertsev.
• Opponent Quality: Serafini has faced tougher opponents averaging a rank of 276.67, unlike Bilozertsev's 334.68 ranked competitors. Does opponent ranking tilt the match's prediction?
• Deciding Set Success: In deciding sets, Serafini has been successful 58% of the time, compared to Bilozertsev's 50%. This could be critical in closely contested matches.
• Break Point Conversion: Bilozertsev edges out Serafini by converting 36.54% of break chances to Serafini's 35.83%, an important factor in live match scenarios.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, we see a pattern of strengths and weaknesses outlined in the stats. Serafini shows a distinct advantage in second serve performance and return statistics, particularly against second serves.

Both players have their preferred surface; however, the match being contested on hard courts could lean in Serafini's favor given their stronger performance there.

Under pressure, Serafini also comes out on top with higher breakpoint save percentages and success rates in deciding sets, often crucial in determining the final match result.

Bilozertsev has shown a better overall win percentage this year and has been more successful at the Futures/ITF $10K level, but Serafini's experiences against better-ranked opponents add valuable resilience.

Given the compiled performance metrics and considering the playing surface, Serafini is the likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.